← Search

Aynsley Fisher

Manakin Sabot, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 108W–110L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Aynsley Fisher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history218 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Hermitage Berens Trilevel · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with AMY LINES
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-08 · Herm Orski-Lines · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Bergeron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · Herm Orski-Lines · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandy Hinchman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · Hermitage Berens Trilevel · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobbie Lou Oley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · Herm Orski-Lines · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandy Hinchman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-24 · Hermitage Berens Trilevel · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-20 · Hermitage Berens Trilevel · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with AMY LINES
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · Hermitage Berens Trilevel · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-17 · Hermitage Berens Trilevel · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · 7 Hermitage Lines Aces · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-21 · Herm Orski-Lines · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with AMY LINES
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-15 · Hermitage Shriner · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelby Morgan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
56%
47W–37L · 51.8% of games
4.5
25%
7W–21L · 38.1% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 47.5% of games
8.0mixed
43.6%
17W–22L · 47.9% of games
8.5mixed
42.9%
9W–12L · 48.1% of games
9.0mixed
60.5%
23W–15L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
46 matches
#1 Singles
18%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
37 matches
#2 Singles
6%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe