← Search

Allyson Reeves

Gainesville, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 41W–44L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Allyson Reeves to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-09-11 · CCC-Reeves · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sherry Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-28 · CCC-Reeves · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Abernathy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-14 · CCC-Reeves · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Abernathy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · CCC-Reeves · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-05 · CCC-Cobb · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Dubose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · CCC-Reeves · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kim Reeves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-24 · CCC-Reeves · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandi Barber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · CCC-Reeves · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandi Barber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Abernathy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-11 · CCC-Loggins · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Abernathy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Abernathy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
64.6%
31W–17L · 56.3% of games
3.5
22.6%
7W–24L · 42.5% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova