← Search

Quin Eliason

— year-end
31 matches · 15W–16L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Quin Eliason to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Jared Christensen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-04 · Wasatch Faults · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-21 · Wasatch Faults · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-30 · Wasatch Faults · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-23 · Wasatch Faults · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-09 · Wasatch Faults · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Flemming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-14 · Ivory Ridge-Bleak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-02-28 · Ivory Ridge-Bleak · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-21 · Ivory Ridge-Bleak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jared Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-14 · Ivory Ridge-Bleak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Flemming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-01-24 · Ivory Ridge-Bleak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trevor Crump
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Teams6 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.1% of games
4.0
54.5%
12W–10L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#1 Singles
16%
5 matches
#2 Singles
16%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams