← Search

Adam Creer

Salt Lake City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 52W–55L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Adam Creer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
2026-03-07 · NomAds · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cameron Willes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-28 · NomAds · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brady Patrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-21 · NomAds · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Meiling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-02-07 · NomAds · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Meiling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · NomAds · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Patrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Jason Wright / George Taylor
2025-05-29 · Cottonwood Club-Eischeid · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-05-22 · Cottonwood Club-Eischeid · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clarke Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-15 · Cottonwood Club-Eischeid · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-01 · Cottonwood Club-Eischeid · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Mokhtarian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-04-24 · Cottonwood Club-Eischeid · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brijesh Parikh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-04-10 · Cottonwood Club-Eischeid · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brijesh Parikh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-07 · Liberty Park Tennis-Arun · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jon Nielson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 58.3% of games
4.0
44.1%
26W–33L · 46.6% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.8% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Male Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal