← Search

Sandra Michel

— year-end
110 matches · 70W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sandra Michel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
L
2026-07-16 · RHCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madeleine Futterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · RHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia McVey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-0
L
2026-06-18 · RHCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirstin McConnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · RHCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie VanAlsburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · RHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie VanAlsburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-03 · RHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Weese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-28 · RHCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-21 · RHCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie VanAlsburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-20 · RHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · RHCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · RHCC RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mindi Pearse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-07 · RHCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mindi Pearse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
82.4%
28W–6L · 60.4% of games
3.5
55.6%
30W–24L · 54.8% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 67.6% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 11.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
22 matches
#1 Singles
16%
18 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer