← Search

Kirstin McConnell

Golden, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
174 matches · 89W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kirstin McConnell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history174 matches
W
2026-09-03 · RHCC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Wendling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-27 · RHCC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaclyn Tracy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-30 · RHCC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie VanAlsburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Danielle Rooney / Lauren Anderson
2026-07-28 · RHCC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Weiman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-23 · RHCC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Kurtz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · RHCC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryn Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · RHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryn Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-02 · RHCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryn Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · RHCC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madeleine Futterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · RHCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Michel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · RHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia McVey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · RHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Grumann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 54% of games
3.0
66%
33W–17L · 56.2% of games
3.5
53.2%
41W–36L · 52.1% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 53.9% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.5% of games
7.0mixed
30%
6W–14L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
25 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe