← Search

Elizabeth Roberts

Kansas City, MO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
210 matches · 133W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Roberts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history210 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-23 · Fendler, Kathleen · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-02 · Fendler, Kathleen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carmen Kowalski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sanja Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-12 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carmen Kowalski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-05 · Fendler, Kathleen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lexie Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-21 · Fendler, Kathleen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Thomley Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kandice Thurman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-15 · Fendler, Kathleen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Thomley Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-01 · Fendler, Kathleen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Doerr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Courtney Root
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-01-18 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Doerr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.7% of games
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 45.3% of games
3.5
70%
7W–3L · 55.5% of games
4.0
74.8%
77W–26L · 58.3% of games
4.5
50%
29W–29L · 51% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
88 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
38 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert