← Search

Meg Daniels

MILLERSVILLE, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 81W–61L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Meg Daniels to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Walsh · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gregory Teal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-10 · Martin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aine McKee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-09-09 · Walsh · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Becker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
Christine Fichtner / Julie Anderson
2026-08-25 · Martin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aine McKee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · Walsh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gregory Teal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-23 · Martin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aine McKee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · Martin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aine McKee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-24 · Walsh · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Ravekes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-07 · Walsh · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hal Bloom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judith Cappello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · Walsh · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeffery Tolliver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-26 · Walsh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shawn Reese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 59% of games
3.0
63.6%
35W–20L · 55.2% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 30% of games
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 60.6% of games
3.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.1% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
58.6%
17W–12L · 53.1% of games
6.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.1% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
24 matches
#1 Singles
13%
19 matches
#2 Singles
11%
15 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams