← Search

DIANE CASANOVA

Annapolis, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
232 matches · 126W–106L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add DIANE CASANOVA to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history232 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Walsh/Wofford · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steven Edwards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-08 · Kelly/Jacobson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stewart Royals mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · Party at the Net · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Trull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-30 · Kelly/Jacobson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott A Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-27 · Kelly/Jacobson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Kelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · Party at the Net · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Trull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-08-08 · Huntington · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yulin Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-06 · Kelly/Jacobson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Kelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Kelly/Jacobson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stewart Royals mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · Party at the Net · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Huntington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-23 · Walsh/Wofford · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steven Edwards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-23 · Kelly/Jacobson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stewart Royals mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
45.1%
32W–39L · 48.6% of games
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 40.1% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
46.7%
14W–16L · 49.2% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 59.7% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 55% of games
3.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
61.5%
24W–15L · 55.2% of games
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
83.8%
31W–6L · 63.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
59 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer