← Search

Dana Weber Noffsinger

Hudson, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 58W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dana Weber Noffsinger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
W
2026-07-16 · A55 6.0W LT1 Burgess · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy McDougal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-22 · A40 3.0W LT Sirak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Soirefman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-11 · A55 6.0W LT1 Burgess · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Therese Forkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-28 · A55 6.0W LT1 Burgess · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Meloy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-21 · A55 6.0W LT1 Burgess · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Lowery-O'Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · A55 6.0W LT1 Burgess · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deb Rutzky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-11 · A40 3.0W LT Sirak · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sloane Burgess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-17 · X55 6.0 LT Meloy · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steven Wood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2025-10-05 · X55 6.0 LT Meloy · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roger Bliss mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-21 · A55 6.0W LT1 Burgess · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Caryl Kolb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-14 · A55 6.0W LT1 Burgess · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jodie Grasgreen DeLamatre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-07-08 · A40 3.0W LT2 Sirak · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Doris Tomko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 66.2% of games
3.0
55.9%
19W–15L · 52.8% of games
5.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 46.4% of games
6.0
61.5%
16W–10L · 52.3% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova