← Search

A Haigler

Pensacola, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 31W–19L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add A Haigler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-03-29 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kazunobu Kawada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-08 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kazunobu Kawada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-02-15 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Struck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with KL LeCOQ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · with Ken McCurdy championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-13 · Escambia/Haigler · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rick Bucco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Wade Wilson / Jim Smith
2025-11-01 · Escambia/Haigler · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrew Hillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-10-08 · Escambia/Haigler55&Over6.0X · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Brann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
2025-10-01 · Escambia/Haigler55&Over6.0X · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Rice mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-07-12 · #3 Doubles · with Will Grace championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Brandon Lenaz / Tim Arant
2025-04-24 · GS-Anderson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-04-15 · Wimberly - RS Clay · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Russell Ball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 59.7% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 28.9% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.4% of games
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 58% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 54% of the time
#3 Doubles
54%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer