← Search

Timothy McNeill

— year-end
99 matches · 61W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Timothy McNeill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
L
2026-05-28 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Good
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Runyan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-30 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Platt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-09 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Good
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-21 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Holmberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-14 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dave King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-21 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Groesbeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-2
W
2026-02-14 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dave King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-01-31 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Francisco Rubio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-24 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stuart Kurtz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-1
L
2025-11-15 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gavin Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
74.6%
50W–17L · 57.6% of games
4.0
33.3%
10W–20L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#2 Male Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova