← Search

Dave King

Heber City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 12W–36L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Dave King to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2026-05-14 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Runyan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-07 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-30 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dennis Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-23 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nate Goates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-10 · Topspinners · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kalee King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-09 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nate Goates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-27 · Ageless · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kalee King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-03-14 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy McNeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-21 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Francisco Rubio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-14 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy McNeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-02-07 · Heber Valley-Holmberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-07 · Ageless · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kalee King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
15.4%
4W–22L · 39.6% of games
8.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.4% of games
8.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 62.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
12 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal