← Search

Julie Espy

Tallahassee, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
274 matches · 146W–128L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie Espy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history274 matches
L
2026-07-31 · Tullos · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mitch Rogers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-17 · Tullos · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mitch Rogers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · Espy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Lim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Espy · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · Espy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Lim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · Tullos · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sanjeev Jayaprakash mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · Espy · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-05 · Tullos · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Thomson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · Espy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Fenton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · Espy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Stratton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-05 · Espy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
Yvette Armstrong / Layne Cox
2026-04-18 · Thomasville/Parker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
66.7%
26W–13L · 57.7% of games
3.5
41.6%
42W–59L · 46.8% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
62.1%
18W–11L · 53.7% of games
7.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 37.6% of games
6.0mixed
80%
16W–4L · 60% of games
6.5mixed
100%
13W–0L · 75.4% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
22W–11L · 55.8% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
81 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
51 matches
#1 Singles
6%
17 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
4%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe