← Search

Aimee Lim

Tallahassee, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 13W–28L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Aimee Lim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-07-14 · Espy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Espy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Espy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-23 · Espy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Espy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Espy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Stratton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Karen de Cardenas / Nancy Donahue
2026-06-04 · Espy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Candace Bunker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-03 · Espy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juliana Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · Espy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-03-17 · Espy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-25 · Espy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-02-16 · Espy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-10 · Espy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-20 · Stratton · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Juliana Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 48.5% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.2% of games
7.5
20%
2W–8L · 47.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.3% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
5 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
7%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal