← Search

Maria Stratton

Monticello, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 9W–54L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Maria Stratton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-07-14 · Espy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Cady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-23 · Espy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carson Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · Espy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Lim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-19 · Espy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Espy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-24 · Espy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Naama Nagar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
Susan Byler / Joan Overman
2026-03-10 · Espy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juliana Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
Jenny Carter / Mary Vanlandingham
2026-03-03 · Espy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindi Giralt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-17 · Espy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carson Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-10 · Espy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Cady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-10 · Stratton · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christelle Roper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-20 · Stratton · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Boulos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-08 · Stratton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Espy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
20%
8W–32L · 36.1% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 30.1% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 29.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
10 matches
#1 Female Singles
6%
4 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
3%
2 matches
#3 Mixed Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert