← Search

Diana Williams Gibau

White Plains, MD
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 50W–57L · seasons 2020–2024

Captains: add Diana Williams Gibau to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
W
2024-10-27 · High Noon Ballers · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chris Takiar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-3
W
2024-10-06 · High Noon Ballers · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chris Takiar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
Alice Ulrichs / Yan Wu
2024-10-05 · #3 Doubles · with Larry Johnson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2024-10-04 · #3 Doubles · with Larry Johnson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-09-21 · #2 Doubles · with Avraham Amram championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Yuan Zhang / Warren Chen
2024-09-20 · #3 Doubles · with Avraham Amram championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
Jens Ruding / Deirdre Hughes
2024-09-20 · #3 Doubles · with Avraham Amram championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-09-15 · High Noon Ballers · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Parmvir Singh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-1
L
2024-09-14 · High Noon Ballers · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Steven Gibau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-2
W
2024-08-18 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Avraham Amram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-1
W
2024-07-26 · Racq Pack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Gibau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-07-13 · Racq Pack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Avraham Amram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
61.1%
22W–14L · 55.8% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 42.9% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.9% of games
6.0mixed
35%
7W–13L · 44.6% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.8% of games
7.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
32 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer