← Search

Avraham Amram

Mechanicsville, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 103W–72L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Avraham Amram to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history175 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Bynum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-30 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Rohm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-23 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Rohm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-08-04 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with PAULA SMITH mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-22 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Gowin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Julie Gowin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with PAULA SMITH championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Yuan Zhang / Liviu Carare
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Julie Gowin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-09 · Racq Pack · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Gowin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-03 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Gowin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Gowin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-30 · Well Strung · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Akash Agrawal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
72%
18W–7L · 57.9% of games
4.0
57.9%
33W–24L · 52.9% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 66.4% of games
4.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.4% of games
7.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.6% of games
7.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 47.4% of games
8.0mixed
50%
11W–11L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
41 matches
#1 Singles
5%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe