← Search

Amy Cagle

Wake Forest, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 65W–79L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amy Cagle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Ju.Johnson40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley McCollum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-31 · As.McCollum18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Kendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · We.Bargoil40C · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Leigh Baxter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-12 · We.Bargoil40C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sheri Roberson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-07 · Ve.Glass40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samantha Starr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-06 · Ju.Johnson40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ann Willard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · As.McCollum18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Kendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-31 · Ve.Glass40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deb Skiko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-30 · Ju.Johnson40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julee Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Em.Rubin18S · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-21 · Ve.Glass18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Shuey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · Ve.Glass18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Juli Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 54.3% of games
3.0
44.3%
27W–34L · 50.8% of games
3.5
10%
2W–18L · 30.8% of games
5.0
50%
3W–3L · 46.4% of games
5.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 49% of games
6.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 56.3% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
32 matches
#1 Singles
15%
22 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer