← Search

Amber Bowden

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 33W–27L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Amber Bowden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-08-24 · Ma.Finney18C6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-22 · Pa.Hankerson18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley McRae
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-15 · Pa.Hankerson18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-10 · Ma.Finney18C6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-03 · Ma.Finney18C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Monica Maxwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · Ma.Finney18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-18 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Perrone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-5
L
2026-07-16 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley McRae
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-09 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley McRae
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-07 · Ma.Finney18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-29 · KGreen-DUR · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-22 · KGreen-DUR · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 64.4% of games
3.5
65.5%
19W–10L · 58.7% of games
4.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 42.7% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 55% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#2 Singles
18%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
8 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King