← Search

Carey Baddour

Chapel Hill, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
444 matches · 239W–205L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carey Baddour to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history444 matches
L
2026-09-11 · CBaddour.18C-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rochelle Grieco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
Sharon Huang / Laura Carlson
2026-09-10 · CBaddour.18C-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marybeth Evers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-08 · MEvers-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Koenigshofer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-25 · TOC.Cloer · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jamie Freedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-14 · Ke.Townsend40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dianna Erwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · Yu.Hager18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Trang Huynh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-05 · TOC.Kim · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Baddour mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · Le.Ji18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Baddour mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-31 · Ke.Townsend40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Travis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-30 · RHutchins-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Baddour mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-30 · Yu.Hager18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rachael Kiker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · TOC.Kim · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Baddour mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams85 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
55.8%
116W–92L · 51.7% of games
4.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 40.8% of games
7.5
58.8%
67W–47L · 52.2% of games
8.5
42.4%
14W–19L · 47% of games
4.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
52.8%
19W–17L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
189 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
141 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
92 matches
#1 Singles
2%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert