← Search

Lee Veit

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 83W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lee Veit to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
L
2026-09-01 · NMAC.Sheehan · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Dee Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-25 · NMAC.Sheehan · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-18 · NMAC.Sheehan · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cameron Ellerbe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · NMAC.Sheehan · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Gwyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · Ma.Ross18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dorsey Manning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · Ma.Ross18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seely Nicholson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · Ma.Ross18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Libby Stubbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-21 · Yv.Barrow40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-21 · Sa.Highsmith18A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-16 · Yv.Barrow40A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parker Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-03-26 · Yv.Barrow40A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amie Irby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-19 · Yv.Barrow40A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvonne Barrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 50.9% of games
3.0
59.6%
28W–19L · 54.7% of games
3.5
44.4%
16W–20L · 52% of games
5.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 56% of games
6.5
55.3%
21W–17L · 50.5% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 31.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
26 matches
#1 Singles
8%
13 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe