← Search

Linda Chuang

CARY, NC
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
298 matches · 188W–110L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Linda Chuang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history298 matches
W
2026-09-01 · MD.Davis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lorraine Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · MD.Davis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brigette Flower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-18 · MD.Davis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brigette Flower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-21 · MD.Pavlick · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · MD.Pavlick · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Hanshew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Steven Harris / Jennifer Ferralli
2026-07-18 · LOCH.Pelt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Chuang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · MD.Pavlick · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Wade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-02 · MD.Pavlick · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Pavlick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · MD.Pavlick · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · LOCH.Pelt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Chuang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · MD.Pavlick · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Hanshew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-06 · LOCH.Pelt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Chuang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
2.5
76.1%
35W–11L · 63% of games
3.0
62.5%
40W–24L · 54.1% of games
3.5
51.2%
21W–20L · 51.6% of games
5.0
80%
12W–3L · 65.5% of games
5.5
60%
18W–12L · 53.1% of games
6.5
67.7%
21W–10L · 59.6% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 44.7% of games
6.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 62.2% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
100 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
95 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
54 matches
#1 Singles
6%
18 matches
#2 Singles
6%
17 matches
#3 Singles
4%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova