← Search

Allison DeMacy

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
391 matches · 272W–119L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Allison DeMacy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history391 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Al.DeMacy18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen Levine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-21 · Al.DeMacy40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Whitney Leab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-18 · TOC.LaPlante · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maggie LaPlante
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-14 · Al.DeMacy40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Hollis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-11 · TOC.LaPlante · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Mazurak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-05 · To.Sutler18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Rawls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · TOC.LaPlante · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Mazurak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-29 · To.Sutler18M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Hampton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · Sa.Rhoades40M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Hampton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · Sa.Rhoades40M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dylan DeMacy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-18 · To.Sutler18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-16 · TOC.Levine · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Ice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams76 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
80.4%
82W–20L · 60.7% of games
4.0
48.1%
37W–40L · 49.5% of games
6.5
84.6%
33W–6L · 66.3% of games
7.5
67.9%
38W–18L · 55% of games
3.5mixed
87.5%
21W–3L · 65.4% of games
4.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 54.7% of games
6.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 43.9% of games
7.0mixed
70.8%
17W–7L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
183 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
132 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
62 matches
#1 Singles
2%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert