← Search

Carly Reese

Heber City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
265 matches · 178W–87L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carly Reese to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history265 matches
L
Meghan Rovelli / Sandee Kozel
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Amber Greenwood championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Janine Nemelka / Michelle Maxfield
2026-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mandy Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Labrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mandy Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-25 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ashley MESSENGER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Probst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-21 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Probst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
63.2%
36W–21L · 55.7% of games
3.5
76.6%
36W–11L · 60.4% of games
4.0
65.2%
75W–40L · 57.9% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 25% of the time
#2 Doubles
25%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
47 matches
#1 Singles
15%
39 matches
#2 Singles
9%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer