← Search

Martha Brown

— year-end
336 matches · 247W–89L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Martha Brown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history336 matches
L
2026-09-11 · SM- I'd Hit That · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Hanks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-10 · Sports Mall-No Love Lost · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Breanne Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · Sports Mall-No Love Lost · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-14 · SM- I'd Hit That · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with JOSEPH BROWN mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · #4 Doubles · with Sonja Blackham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Breanne Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonja Blackham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-10 · SM- I'd Hit That · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with JOSEPH BROWN mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deb Chaltron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Breanne Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams70 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 65.9% of games
3.0
81.6%
40W–9L · 65.3% of games
3.5
84.7%
50W–9L · 64.7% of games
4.0
72.1%
75W–29L · 59.3% of games
6.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 65% of games
6.5mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 60.8% of games
7.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
15W–9L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
170 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
57 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams