← Search

Katheryn Burriesci

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
203 matches · 108W–95L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Katheryn Burriesci to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history203 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Mixed Signals · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Burriesci mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Mixed Signals · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Burriesci mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-24 · Mixed Signals · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steve Elwer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-17 · Mixed Signals · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caleb Roope mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · Mixed Signals · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Burriesci mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · NetChix 18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessika Hulewsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-08 · NetChix 18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Cowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-27 · NetChix 18 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-18 · NetChix 18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Cowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-05-12 · Servivors · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Cowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-07 · Servivors · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · Mix n Match · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Burriesci mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
67.7%
21W–10L · 53.7% of games
4.0
48.1%
25W–27L · 47.9% of games
7.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 60.1% of games
8.0
48.5%
16W–17L · 52% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
53.6%
15W–13L · 50.3% of games
7.5mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 49% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
48 matches
#2 Singles
7%
14 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer