← Search

Mark Burriesci

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 90W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mark Burriesci to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Mixed Signals · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katheryn Burriesci mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Mixed Signals · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katheryn Burriesci mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · Mixed Signals · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katheryn Burriesci mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · with Jessika Hulewsky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Alice Livesay championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Jessika Hulewsky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Jessika Hulewsky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · Over Served · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Peterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-06 · Over Served · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-03 · Mix n Match · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katheryn Burriesci mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-04-29 · Over Served · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Elwer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-22 · Over Served · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Elwer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
80%
12W–3L · 66.7% of games
3.5
69.6%
39W–17L · 56% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
61.5%
16W–10L · 53.8% of games
7.5mixed
41.7%
10W–14L · 47.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
27 matches
#1 Singles
16%
23 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova