← Search

Denisa Hiles

Dublin, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
232 matches · 153W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Denisa Hiles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history232 matches
L
2026-07-09 · Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tayler Blake
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Rittenberry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-18 · Racquet Club 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Rittenberry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-08 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Emily Craig / Alison Scott
2026-05-04 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janine Kiser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Belinda Hildebrandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-20 · Racquet Club 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angela Flanigan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Stephanie Johnson / Colleen Mathews
2026-04-17 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-13 · Racquet Club 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angela Flanigan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
Jessica Nimjee / Alison Scott
2026-03-21 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-03-13 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-09 · Racquet Club 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Rittenberry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
73.2%
115W–42L · 57.9% of games
4.0
46.8%
22W–25L · 48.8% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
108 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
89 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
31 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe