← Search

Dani Crooker

Bradley Beach, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 88W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dani Crooker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
L
2026-05-11 · All Balled Up · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-30 · Tri-Luv · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Bellaran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Heather Larson / Beth Dencker
2025-08-23 · #4 Doubles · with Pamela Laufenberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2025-07-01 · All Balled Up. · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Bellaran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-2
W
2025-06-17 · All Balled Up. · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Bellaran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-06-09 · Tightly Strung · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-05-20 · All Balled Up. · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ariella Soffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-25 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christine Braceland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-02-04 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-28 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-01-21 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 68.4% of games
3.5
68.1%
49W–23L · 57% of games
4.0
47.5%
19W–21L · 47% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 23.2% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
25 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer