← Search

Dawn Keaton

Yardley, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
402 matches · 257W–145L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dawn Keaton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history402 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Ann Tracey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Ann Tracey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-08 · Grit & Grace · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Tracey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · Grit & Grace · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Tracey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · Grit & Grace · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Tracey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Ann Tracey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Ann Tracey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-30 · Diff'rent Strokes · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathleen Francioso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-27 · Pennsbury Peacocks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Tracey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · 2 Bucks & Beyond · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Tracey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · Mercer United · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Chion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-03 · Mercer United · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Veysman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 57.5% of games
3.5
78.8%
41W–11L · 59.2% of games
4.0
64.3%
157W–87L · 55.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 50.2% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
46.2%
18W–21L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
247 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
92 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
44 matches
#1 Singles
3%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal