← Search

Catie Grove

Rumson, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
227 matches · 135W–92L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catie Grove to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history227 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Helen Liu / Catherine Shaw
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Melinda Trang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-24 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-29 · Monmouth: Penn Ball Wizards · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · Monmouth: Penn Ball Wizards · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · Dangerous Divas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eileen Goss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Singles · 0.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-5
W
2026-05-20 · Dangerous Divas · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-2
L
2026-05-19 · Penn Ball Wizards · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Melinda Trang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · Dangerous Divas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eileen Goss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-12 · Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Singles · 0.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-05 · Penn Ball Wizards · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Karen Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.1% of games
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
93.8%
15W–1L · 73.9% of games
3.5
71.2%
42W–17L · 61.1% of games
4.0
49.5%
54W–55L · 49.7% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 28.4% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
87 matches
#1 Singles
35%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
21 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams