← Search

Christine Rosenkrantz

Chicago, IL
4.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
46 matches · 26W–20L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christine Rosenkrantz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-08-02 · #4 Doubles · with Christine Meade championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-17 · CDTA S 40&OW4.5 2.Wilm Burns Mon 7 $ · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeanine Stathopoulos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rosemary Swierk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-22 · CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-24 · CDTA W 40&OW4.5 4.Wlmt Burns Sat 5 $20 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christine Meade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-13 · CDTA E 40&OW4.5 4Gnbk Burns Sat 3 $30 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jean Soh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-06 · CDTA E 55&OW8.0 1Tam Corey Sun 1 $22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sang Boon Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-11-01 · CDTA E 40&OW4.5 4Gnbk Burns Sat 3 $30 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heike Spahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-07-28 · CDTA S A55W8.0 1Tam Corey Mon 7 $22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2022-04-24 · NITA W 85CWa TAM (Lobo-Corey) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christine Meade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2022-03-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tina Lagges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2022-02-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jill Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
56%
14W–11L · 53.7% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 42% of games
8.5
60%
6W–4L · 50.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova