← Search

Robin D'Esposito

— year-end
65 matches · 49W–16L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Robin D'Esposito to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-06-07 · Team Heimowitz · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Arielle Cassidy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-6
L
2026-05-09 · Team Heimowitz · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Arielle Cassidy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-5
L
2024-04-14 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Egbert Baldovino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-03-02 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Egbert Baldovino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2023-08-22 · Nassau 2 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-5, 1-0
W
2023-08-13 · Nassau 2 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2023-07-18 · Boczon · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathy Maguire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2023-07-06 · Boczon · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Anne Kelly / Rosalyn Martini
2023-03-23 · NOT ADVANCING/Favia · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Anne Kelly / Christine Braceland
2023-01-31 · NOT ADVANCING/Favia · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2022-10-23 · Favia · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Tina Jago / Jennifer Nelson
2022-10-07 · #1 Doubles · with Heather Larson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams10 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
77.3%
17W–5L · 62.1% of games
4.0
100%
8W–0L · 67.1% of games
4.5
50%
3W–3L · 45.8% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 72.1% of games
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 57.2% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer