← Search

Christine Hegan

Florham Park, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
169 matches · 121W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christine Hegan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history169 matches
W
2026-06-19 · Team Downey · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Takako Komatsuzaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-09 · Team Downey · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Maguire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-1
W
2026-04-26 · Team Downey · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Takako Komatsuzaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-02-19 · Strand · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniela Dumitru-Buna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-02-12 · Strand · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniela Dumitru-Buna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-5
W
N/A
2026-02-05 · Strand · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniela Dumitru-Buna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Connie Hauck Hall / MIRABEL GRAHAM
2026-01-29 · Strand · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7
L
2026-01-22 · Strand · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-01-15 · Strand · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Juanita Tam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-08 · Strand · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Vitale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-12-11 · Strand · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yvonne Evelyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-12-04 · Strand · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
73.4%
113W–41L · 59.4% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
33 matches
#1 Singles
18%
31 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer