← Search

Michelle Sisay

— year-end
149 matches · 81W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michelle Sisay to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
W
2025-12-13 · Bent Creek Breaking Bad (Mieszkalski) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-11-19 · Bent Creek - Mieszkalski · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Donohue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-11-14 · Bent Creek - Houston · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan Tiburtini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-11-13 · Bent Creek - Mieszkalski · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary McNamara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-08 · Bent Creek - Houston · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Melissa Houston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-11-05 · Bent Creek - Mieszkalski · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Otoole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-02 · Bent Creek Breaking Bad (Mieszkalski) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2025-10-16 · Bent Creek - Mieszkalski · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Donohue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2025-10-09 · Bent Creek - Mieszkalski · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Otoole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-10-05 · Bent Creek - Houston · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Melissa Houston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-09-21 · Bent Creek - Houston · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Linda Mieszkalski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-20 · Bent Creek Breaking Bad (Mieszkalski) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pahn Sisay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Teams39 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 45.2% of games
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 88.2% of games
3.5
48.8%
20W–21L · 50.7% of games
7.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 47% of games
6.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 56.6% of games
7.0mixed
59.1%
26W–18L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
37 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams