← Search

Sophia Duke

— year-end
45 matches · 32W–13L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Sophia Duke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Kathy Steed championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-18 · Hempfield Crush - Lingenfelter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Steed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-17 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Barcheski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-16 · Hempfield Crush - Lingenfelter · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-29 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-28 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Holder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · Hempfield Crush - Lingenfelter · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Barcheski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-11 · Hempfield Crush - Lingenfelter · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-07 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Lingenfelter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-02 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams10 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
89.7%
26W–3L · 66.4% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.1% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 47% of the time
#1 Singles
47%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
12 matches
#2 Singles
13%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova