← Search

Andrea Holder

Denver, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
303 matches · 147W–156L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrea Holder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history303 matches
L
2026-08-18 · Hempfield - Camp Tait · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-13 · Hempfield - Camp Tait · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-30 · Hempfield - Camp Tait · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Hempfield - Camp Tait · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Laurie Lingenfelter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-24 · Hempfield - Dimm · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Alderman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-17 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Garber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-07-17 · Hempfield - Hangen 55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with JoAnne Hangen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-16 · Hempfield - Dimm · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Nolt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · Hempfield - Camp Tait · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · Hempfield Crush - Lingenfelter · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 61.9% of games
3.5
58.3%
56W–40L · 52.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 39.6% of games
6.0
100%
4W–0L · 66.2% of games
7.0
62.3%
43W–26L · 54.7% of games
7.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.4% of games
8.0
12.5%
4W–28L · 36.7% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
6W–15L · 44% of games
8.0mixed
8.3%
1W–11L · 34.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
75 matches
#1 Singles
24%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
51 matches
#2 Singles
7%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams