← Search

Noreen McDonald

— year-end
106 matches · 66W–40L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Noreen McDonald to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-09-08 · HHerndon-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Regina Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
Lisa Watkins / Marti Jenkins
2026-08-18 · HHerndon-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Jarrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-19 · #4 Doubles · with Kristen Fuller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Wendy Parker / Rachael Schuler
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · with Karen Wood championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
Amy Hoots / Kelly Johnson
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · with Olivia Lara championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-21 · KFuller-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olivia Lara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-14 · KFuller-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-07 · KFuller-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth McNamara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-10 · KFuller-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheridan Meltsner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-24 · KFuller-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheridan Meltsner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-17 · KFuller-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-07 · HHerndon-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Yvonne Acker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 55.9% of games
4.0
63.3%
19W–11L · 53.1% of games
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 66.7% of games
7.5
61.5%
16W–10L · 55.8% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams