← Search

Julie Matkin

— year-end
121 matches · 71W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie Matkin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
L
2026-04-19 · Steinhart/Borghi (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Langan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-21 · Steinhart/Borghi (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Langan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · Steinhart/Borghi (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Langan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-22 · Steinhart/Borghi (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Haffner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-15 · Steinhart/Borghi (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judy Malpiedi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-10-26 · Steinhart/Borghi (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyra Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-10-12 · Steinhart/Borghi (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyra Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-09-21 · Steinhart/Borghi (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyra Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-04-06 · Steinhart/Borghi (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-03-16 · Steinhart/Borghi (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyra Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2025-03-09 · Steinhart/Borghi (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyra Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-02-23 · Steinhart/Borghi (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyra Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams27 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
63.6%
35W–20L · 55.2% of games
3.5
54%
27W–23L · 50.2% of games
6.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 50.8% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 60.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
27 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer