← Search

Linda Eisenbeis

— year-end
135 matches · 60W–75L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Linda Eisenbeis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
W
2026-07-08 · Mrazek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Muckler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-24 · Mrazek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Muckler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · Mrazek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · Mrazek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Sklansky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · Mrazek · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Goetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · Mrazek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-02 · Burkart/Rechtlich · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Grigg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-30 · Burkart/Rechtlich · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lolly Cottrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-19 · Johnson/Blades (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Franke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · Johnson/Blades (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Randoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-15 · Johnson/Blades (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-10 · STL/Rhoads/65&Over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ginger Kluesner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams39 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 57.4% of games
3.5
34.5%
29W–55L · 44.9% of games
6.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.8% of games
7.0
62.2%
23W–14L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King