← Search

Michelle Ziemian

Littleton, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
206 matches · 142W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michelle Ziemian to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history206 matches
W
2026-09-01 · KC-RH BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Barnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-25 · KC-RH BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Barnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-18 · KC-RH BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · KC-RH BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Barnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · KC-RH PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Barnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · KC-RH BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Barnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · KC-RH PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Barnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · KC-RH PURPLE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · KC-RH PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Barnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · KC-RH PURPLE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · KC-CC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Barnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-06-30 · KC-CC NAVY · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
75%
21W–7L · 60.9% of games
3.5
86.1%
31W–5L · 66.2% of games
4.0
69.3%
79W–35L · 58.3% of games
4.5
8.3%
1W–11L · 29.2% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
24 matches
#1 Female Singles
11%
22 matches
#2 Singles
9%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams