← Search

Erin Barnett

Littleton, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
164 matches · 112W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Erin Barnett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history164 matches
W
2026-09-01 · KC-RH BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Ziemian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-25 · KC-RH BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Ziemian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-11 · KC-RH BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Ziemian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · KC-RH PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Ziemian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · KC-RH BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Ziemian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · KC-RH PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Ziemian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · KC-RH PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Ziemian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · KC-CC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Ziemian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-06-30 · KC-CC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Gregg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · KC-CC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Ziemian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · KC-RH BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Ziemian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6
W
2026-06-16 · KC-CC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Ziemian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 62.1% of games
3.5
80%
24W–6L · 60.3% of games
4.0
67.9%
76W–36L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
38 matches
#1 Singles
13%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
16 matches
#1 Female Singles
5%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams