← Search

Christopher Duke

Louisville, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 22W–26L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Christopher Duke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-08-16 · KY/LOU/CALDWELL/MCCOY · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anthony Tuggle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-26 · KY/LOU/CALDWELL/MCCOY · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Craig Aguiar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-02 · KY/LOU/McGlone · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darnell McCoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-02-01 · KY/LOU/MCCOY/CALDWELL · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-18 · KY/LOU/MCCOY/CALDWELL · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-01-10 · KY/LOU/MCCOY/CALDWELL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darnell McCoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-13 · KY/LOU/MCCOY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Hinds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-12-07 · KY/LOU/MCCOY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Samuel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-11-15 · KY/LOU/MCGRAIL · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mitchell Zuberi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-09 · KY/LOU/MCGRAIL · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Darnell McCoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
David Bowman / Carlo Coronel
2025-09-21 · KY/LOU/MCGRAIL · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matthew McGrail
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
Joshua Samuel / Nathan Smith
2025-08-16 · KY/LOU/MCGRAIL · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bobby Whitmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
59.1%
13W–9L · 55.9% of games
4.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 41.2% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
20%
1W–4L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#2 Singles
19%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#1 Singles
13%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova