← Search

Suzanne Jeska

Morrisville, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
276 matches · 171W–105L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Suzanne Jeska to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history276 matches
W
2026-09-13 · ACP.Lowrance · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Omell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · TOC.Barcinas · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Diane Volkmar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · TOC.Barcinas · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Smita Shukla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-18 · TOC.Kim · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · TOC.Barcinas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miho Ogura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · TOC.Kim · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Fu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-16 · TOC.Barcinas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robyn Merck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · TOC.Barcinas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Barcinas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · TOC.Barcinas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · with Melissa House championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · #3 Doubles · with Melissa House championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · with Kimberly Latzy championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
84.9%
45W–8L · 65.6% of games
3.5
56.1%
69W–54L · 52.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 90.6% of games
6.5
65%
26W–14L · 53.8% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.9% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 34.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
93 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
55 matches
#1 Singles
6%
16 matches
#2 Singles
5%
14 matches
#3 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe