← Search

Kimberly Latzy

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 111W–55L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Latzy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history166 matches
L
2026-08-31 · ACP.Lowrance · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joy Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-23 · TOC.Shukla · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amber Bruner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-17 · ACP.Lowrance · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Wolborsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · KF.Scagnelli · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robyn Merck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · KF.Scagnelli · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Scagnelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · KF.Scagnelli · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mari Stratemeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · NMAC.Lowrance · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · TOC.Barcinas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Barcinas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · TOC.Kim · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miho Ogura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · NMAC.Lowrance · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-27 · NMAC.Lowrance · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · TOC.Barcinas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miho Ogura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
70%
7W–3L · 64.5% of games
3.0
62.9%
22W–13L · 57.7% of games
3.5
60.4%
32W–21L · 53% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 84% of games
5.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 66.7% of games
6.5
68.2%
15W–7L · 59.1% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
30 matches
#1 Singles
5%
9 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches
#3 Singles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert