← Search

Verhonica Hirst

Lakewood, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
183 matches · 126W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Verhonica Hirst to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history183 matches
L
2026-09-01 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Orgel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-18 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Orgel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-11 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Orgel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-04 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Bock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Bock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · NJ TEAL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josiane Broussard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · NJ TEAL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-23 · NJ TEAL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · NJ TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-05-26 · NJ GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Bock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-23 · NJ GOLD · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Bock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-21 · NJ GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Bock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
82.9%
29W–6L · 66.6% of games
4.0
61.5%
40W–25L · 55.3% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
100%
11W–0L · 68.6% of games
7.0mixed
82.6%
19W–4L · 61.9% of games
7.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.4% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
7W–14L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
39 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova