← Search

Jeanne Peoples

Broomfield, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
221 matches · 111W–110L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeanne Peoples to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history221 matches
L
2026-09-01 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Gosselin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-06 · LTA-Q RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Nelsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacy Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-07-31 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Vogel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-30 · LTA-Q RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Bonnette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-28 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Gosselin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-23 · LTA-Q RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Bonnette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · BRMST BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · BRMST BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Gosselin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · LTA-Q RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacy Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-28 · BRMST BLUE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sean ONeil mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-23 · BRMST BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Tedesco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
49.2%
64W–66L · 49.6% of games
8.0
80%
16W–4L · 58.5% of games
7.5mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 45.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
17W–17L · 49.8% of games
8.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
48 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams