← Search

James Vandenbossche

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 6W–22L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add James Vandenbossche to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
W
2026-06-30 · Jo.Nance55M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Reiss mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · Jo.Nance55M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jocelyn Badulis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · Jo.Nance40A · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-27 · Jo.Nance55A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ben Hund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-20 · Jo.Nance55A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ayden Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-19 · Jo.Nance18A · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-12 · Jo.Nance18A · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-08 · Jo.Nance40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Emanuel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-30 · Jo.Nance55A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ayden Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · Jo.Nance18A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joel Nance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-27 · Jo.Nance55A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Reardon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-25 · Jo.Nance40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tom Pullara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–8L · 40.7% of games
3.5
25%
3W–9L · 36.1% of games
3.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
7 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova