← Search

Camille Blommer

Durham, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 73W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Camille Blommer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
W
2026-08-20 · DWebb.C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donna Holtaway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · DWebb.C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marti Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-16 · PDavis-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · PDavis-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-02 · PDavis-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · PDavis-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-19 · PDavis-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Ginger Wessell / Nancy Bowers
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · with Barbara Howe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Lulu Conekin / Yvonne Kleiman
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · with Barbara Howe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
Tracy Kinsey / Carol Davis
2026-04-14 · DWebb-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Louise Tabron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-07 · DWebb-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-01 · DWebb-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
50.6%
43W–42L · 50.3% of games
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 46.2% of games
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.6% of games
6.5
50%
20W–20L · 50.1% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
31 matches
#1 Singles
18%
27 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams